From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-40229-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 24611 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 21:10:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 40229
Received: (qmail 24513 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2016 21:10:56 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.161.177):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.267646 secs); 22 Dec 2016 21:10:56 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.161.177 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=rj6iO9PDlfcBCC9VC8o3NuVbhR2L8YC3IQKRQGmRHPk=;
        b=zs+Nqh5pcOWOsT8gvBh82nVkJXkNAq3YSLivo5nqFsNwYvgwjU9owm5OPtnH22GUuO
         4S5F91cbEMcW76NUi4NiuGEgXXyyfow95tYDp5PQhzhHfwHSKqtD6WC936n+lNivqxhU
         m55CqvKMfIvvJyXYs2g0Oh6F0kyRK9Q/eNRPDfo1gn10IuFPzJ1qMhmHUvqeidD9uPZe
         AXzAAs5PueMnB/O5UICmdQjAGQ5Qt/nDGtI7Dc8raX9vr5dGPw2hwsD5YcOj8MyrA8gR
         NXaywzEiH4ErBi/eHvid7kBXboqsl15ICOwGOiwjSN4OAXeDg1DR67PELFdWF3raw4WD
         XFxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=rj6iO9PDlfcBCC9VC8o3NuVbhR2L8YC3IQKRQGmRHPk=;
        b=apLWipn9vIWzPkGwM8pvU+ptJ7w/B3GpkOQOYJvWa6AIiOI6K3RowTyqk7kGDc0Nai
         O9162wC87YiIOrw5rWkzPTU43KmCceWEplUyT1RwMbayDjHVE+8mb9rftMBTXfRjGXE8
         iSdLLjdYso9qcTV3s/JimCVyTWdkUbB2UKE74qukt9oPqTiV9ib4+GEhJbQsmiZIEq07
         OrDcY0kyMQp4TuXvQj7K6OfwdgR7o2LmBPHNMbXlYtpRgKhYoF9yVqqCoK2xkOJVO2bw
         Ax4F/ItymFlOPWn5OQOt9JwGDnoe+ZXE81LxMr2W/DwrRg5X9zjOJ8FgVKtj9alYt/I4
         1b/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIPEzoEuw6o64zlrLjRN1QGp+qvC2rHxxoNVm0+Oe9w/9OaiBxxf3bKDls8Kk5AGg==
X-Received: by 10.13.214.81 with SMTP id y78mr9256171ywd.4.1482441045682;
        Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:10:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <161222131044.ZM3715@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:10:44 -0800
In-Reply-To: <1482433489.24491.17.camel@niobium.home.fifi.org>
Comments: In reply to Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
        "Re: indented heredocs" (Dec 22, 11:04am)
References: <CFA2339B-26F2-4104-AAD2-64852509286B@yost.com> 
	<CAH+w=7bGEb13SUxX-whdHzWRktoiMdvgSosJvcEoZ+t0z3FOhA@mail.gmail.com> 
	<CAH+w=7aWm9ZTYr2mh_1T+9mmHQXN9L_CYz878FoqMzwUerL72w@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1482433489.24491.17.camel@niobium.home.fifi.org>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: indented heredocs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Dec 22, 11:04am, Philippe Troin wrote:
}
} Isn't the whole thing overkill?

Maybe.

} If you want anything fancier, you can always used sed [...]
} or even zsh itself

Indeed, I'm sure this is more of an aesthetic consideration than
anything else -- neatly indented code and all that.  Having to throw
in an additional process or loop to achieve better readability in
the here-document adds ugliness and is somewhat obfuscatory.