From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16493 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 12:10:59 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 12:10:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 5749 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2004 12:10:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19681 Received: (qmail 5733 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 12:10:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 12:10:39 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [130.225.247.86] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 12:10:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2635 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 11:43:58 -0000 Received: from lhuumrelay3.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net (62.189.58.19) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 11:43:48 -0000 Received: from MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (mailhost1.csr.com [62.189.183.235]) by lhuumrelay3.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i2OBhLv15905 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:43:21 GMT Received: from EXCHANGE02.csr.com (unverified [192.168.137.45]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:42:58 +0000 Received: from csr.com ([192.168.144.127]) by EXCHANGE02.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:45:54 +0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Using zftp with a non-standard port In-reply-to: "Peter Stephenson"'s message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:44:19 GMT." <18236.1080056659@csr.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:43:21 +0000 Message-ID: <16402.1080128601@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2004 11:45:54.0367 (UTC) FILETIME=[9066C4F0:01C41195] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=6.0 tests=EXCUSE_16 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 0.2 Peter Stephenson wrote: > we would have something like: > > zfopen '[FEDC:BA98:7654:3210:FEDC:BA98:7654:3210]:21' > > It's not backwardly compatible, but literal IPv6 addresses are currently > so rare that this might be a good time to make sure they don't break > anything. There was no reply, so I have unilaterally imposed this solution and committed the amended patch. (I even had an IPv6 host to test it on.) There's a note in Etc/NEWS. - Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com **********************************************************************