From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6962 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2017 03:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40315 Received: (qmail 28254 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2017 03:47:42 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua0-f179.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.179):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.961595 secs); 09 Jan 2017 03:47:42 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=qC61HW4V1jSTXahNq/qsS+5SUk5oU0rYg3eD4OWUfkg=; b=mdkx1y4rV6bLzbGcPAEbNdEZdR6wA9fLUZhSWSycPgE/LWDlfPzXDfxOVArp4QSTaR UamilMtF/buqch20sLkOjWeEOhZ4WL80VO6qxZQLckhjvmMX8o45volpnLn5cPGIIMiI X9ZSz5Y8z4luHiI9AK4PFjgrCVajvObb0hNymw0+rorTy/+4VllPZsy9sCAiOm879ArT d02IgMCIdO6cegdnbUqCWest0+XtHF3L9t2l2zJCBwBTF/9E7hbIDEqcj/0prWkNrQLT nrptEGE56Te5KaE0+h/duD03BTfydD/e0sjPsoroHIEyUxB0vzRembaW9oA6kJ5SkCZO uIjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=qC61HW4V1jSTXahNq/qsS+5SUk5oU0rYg3eD4OWUfkg=; b=to23n7UWZIvWI7CNM0f2zmkU8CvD7Gn2Avof2Xmi8jVASRb/QwlGDTQZNhHRck6j9A gmMMd7XtzxZz7iTU2uk6cNixzq7RkkucZ++u+Q8v8LTTbhVOjp84C15A/ggU7Q/sGWjs mlylgfRsXyWbU34uK0hPvPtWds3oP9Sfz7iWn3xHAFMSNIv12SVcAISWst0IwElqTxsy oYOv24e/rQ16xTrZrblWEKUS/s3BnQiaK7UzuE5xJZgExwsIhPl/T+q9FmUTIsGzup2Z LogTtCNviE/MyjnHC+O/3gMZB1Xx9BzsIsBMaaUOh8DgeyBlOjdXqvmHSFsIGmCYp/OE nqIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJCcv6dWbV7x4PcXK0AOtxtEhWUMf5rMjPjzBPD/rKN0qO3vqs8Nw3OYI97O1/Z6A== X-Received: by 10.176.84.148 with SMTP id p20mr965412uaa.50.1483920554838; Sun, 08 Jan 2017 16:09:14 -0800 (PST) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <170108160921.ZM11340@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:09:21 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170108191922.3d3de59f@ntlworld.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Defining function based on alias" (Jan 8, 7:19pm) References: <20170107221659.1b9232da@ntlworld.com> <20170108191922.3d3de59f@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: Defining function based on alias MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 8, 7:19pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } I am about to commit the following, which I hope will hope will stop } people coming to grief with this common confusion. Please say if you } see any problems. OK, here's an unusual case ... alias safely:foo='[[ -n $functions[foo] ]] || foo' safely:foo() { echo this is foo only if no other foo } I hesitate to suggest further convolutions, but maybe an option to the alias command to "locally" switch on ALIAS_FUNC_DEF if it's actually *meant* to be used that way? Probably not very important.