From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4716 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 10:35:56 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 10:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 17101 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 10:35:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19518 Received: (qmail 17092 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 10:35:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 10:35:47 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [62.189.58.19] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 10:35:47 -0000 Received: from MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (mailhost1.csr.com [62.189.183.235]) by lhuumrelay3.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i22AZlv24355 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:35:47 GMT Received: from EXCHANGE02.csr.com (unverified [192.168.137.45]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:35:28 +0000 Received: from csr.com ([192.168.144.127]) by EXCHANGE02.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:37:22 +0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Typos in committed terminfo.c and terminfo.mdd? In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:45:03 GMT." <1040301184503.ZM24768@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:35:46 +0000 Message-ID: <17023.1078223746@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2004 10:37:22.0014 (UTC) FILETIME=[5828FFE0:01C40042] Bart Schaefer wrote: > I just diffed my local build source (which was patched using posted diffs > from zsh-workers) against my cvs sandbox and found these tidbits: > > diff ../zsh-forge/current/Src/Modules/terminfo.c ./Src/Modules/terminfo.c > 368c368 > < #endif /* USE_TERMINOF_MODULE */ > --- > > #endif /* USE_TERMINFO_MODULE */ > > > diff ../zsh-forge/current/Src/Modules/terminfo.mdd ./Src/Modules/terminfo.md > d > 3c3 > < link='if test "x$ac_cv_func_tigetflag" = xyes -a "x$ac_cv_header_curses_h" > = xyes; then > --- > > link='if test "x$ac_cv_func_tigetflag" = xyes -a "x$ac_cv_header_curses_h"; > then The first is a typo, the second is correct: the newer version (the first) tests the variable against `yes'. Oliver noticed there was something missing in the older version of the patch. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com **********************************************************************