From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24586 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2017 16:10:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40887 Received: (qmail 24562 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2017 16:10:52 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua0-f169.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.169):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.898261 secs); 23 Mar 2017 16:10:52 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=QeOJgVRu0BjMtyhOgsBaKnP6zk7hK/3C3La6ofXB2Pg=; b=cy+w4Zj7r/FX8PRXyPivAwptwa5BZa7ayzzW9nB7mEzZeTLZBuumEPfNte9ZeeIeNS jLbYKMsMpHwZnfWSLGq+7W4HycEgNCoH5hAGMjFtsFaC/aVJ3ccqkZDjMEKYODeWQyXx PETx3h2H4a/uB8Vvi/Eja84iH/NGu+TGMhVsavLdz0DIeOvl4dZMY4wBzPgD9zgUSkrs MmQd1KntPPz3DbMaM8FbJnwBTfnSrspAnOqYA7xHN0LIFFZNvBHBjzVRw/H2TtSHNTxJ 4G5MDadY7jUtL/r1wrdwlHzd0FqmBtFP1wCi+u4LBu3dhtTyupX2ylLhXghww+mqZ8WZ qC8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=QeOJgVRu0BjMtyhOgsBaKnP6zk7hK/3C3La6ofXB2Pg=; b=ps9Mi8kRQCqFZifyhy4qyiiTp0ZSgfJUBO/teS666H5U0WxpOOyWWhEjrOX6dsofAd 2pDScxQb/HyoJM9v1e/3xxeq+Aswz+DZB/soCUrYTXZIJrEq8Arh+UVXT2lH9WDrvG3l Ghox2ZKUcRFR2w4PpoX1brcUM8G2rBGDWmr41k02VT0k5rO4WYaOevudWALgV5aKmQSV +HUgPQb4sM6mQ71LQY29V+twrl+KhrE9lwHGn8Wofl08YgZW9jB3EjDQN9G1tp8MIxRt bhn9kBlCccrD8YrzHkotCSp+I3feiIda1tmXelP42+KX5UYW4J+J5uDXXvY5XLQ/Eygy UJ5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3ZZbAreO+JfzIwIA8Cttd0W2eyVJIBOKpOm6kntOF/CV4GgaGnTvTfadcUYTTaFw== X-Received: by 10.176.74.23 with SMTP id q23mr1340906uae.100.1490285445020; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:10:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <170323091142.ZM8335@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:11:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <29695ed3-9436-b066-311a-bec4e237b6fd@inlv.org> Comments: In reply to Martijn Dekker "Re: LINENO behaviour in sh mode" (Mar 23, 4:09am) References: <170322194527.ZM5658@torch.brasslantern.com> <29695ed3-9436-b066-311a-bec4e237b6fd@inlv.org> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: LINENO behaviour in sh mode MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 23, 4:09am, Martijn Dekker wrote: } } Op 23-03-17 om 03:45 schreef Bart Schaefer: } > You're forgetting about the second effect of this, which is to print } > "(eval)" in xtrace output instead of the script or function name. Try } > your test again with "set -x" ... } } Yes, but how is that a problem? Seems like logical behaviour to me. Just pointing out that it's another difference that will appear. It may not matter but someone might care about their prompt changing etc. } (BTW, Bart, all your messages have been coming through zwh-workers in } duplicate for quite some time now, the second copy always about 2K } larger than the first due to extra routing headers.) Thanks for letting me know; that means at least some of gmail's SMTP relays are off the blocklist used by primenet. Gmail inbox suppresses duplicates and so apparently does the list archive (do both copies of what you see have the same X-Seq ?) so I can't see the effect myself. I'll try this one without the second copy and see what happens.