From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-40968-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 20953 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2017 16:19:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 40968
Received: (qmail 8316 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2017 16:19:52 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.213.43):SA:0(-2.8/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.561651 secs); 13 Apr 2017 16:19:52 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=T8qJMPmGcJFGqZFFlhw8JU9F8rqvy1Cs0mBmS91VLzE=;
        b=LeF03s9Q5e/47x8QrjqzZ13CKzqsV5kAMJe7mXc3fTPNJ70JinLyr351KHv1B8604E
         cgdEFDuPJWV15Lyw8onmsXk6fFDXns2IICac0jIJCLsAdRFtBYBnrW7O+NEIyf9XjugN
         75SD7Qm3mZD18tHTVA3z1Vi4jFD0G8znwJsqFrZud3Fy4c0OZBX8+n0uZhie+X7KXdi0
         kPfY/66WQst/jdT7yR2+GKSIBEAaParwuo9GScyEpDTUGZBLr1YMsslVsKw7bwFACEKv
         5K0z705LjQgcF13coi+FBYpCdJpb1ARi66z6N1CGQoM3mmHR9eOcgSGNT3lfAyRCsXXo
         W5aA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=T8qJMPmGcJFGqZFFlhw8JU9F8rqvy1Cs0mBmS91VLzE=;
        b=K+efVdkNKVomyFAFPRJSfHPmbqccIyHkV/yCyLJdXyHlLbNgREA8V3HJet0FicL69Z
         QvZZSkbFaLLGU7U7YrdAsKrIE/szhy3vZVEqxN/JdzLDAgSCmKPiBgmsflGrSZB+a7t6
         yEdr8TK/xco7hpXP9O+5RpKAeQ9gDVKbkQnfPXlo/iZU+CHBSvwrPClWnDG9L+qISeV7
         FWTpyc6fSJSOhsMcDGjvQ71UKijZxRxbVcYiiu9Ocb0CVlYwqAvzpmQya2ApTsUvM+or
         5yS0iM30oSpF003/8awHWh19pQKn+8Q4VpQZ7oYnaS8kWp+G/29nUMOcVURTRh17U5oj
         qPdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Bm+x+fA89+Lm9s8QijWST3r8G1D5jrpX+QlNB6AnCIMdd8zQy
	7nkkSZi5eBuu+M8p
X-Received: by 10.31.75.68 with SMTP id y65mr1574465vka.46.1492100385332;
        Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <170413092003.ZM11236@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:20:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <34487.1492098269@hydra.kiddle.eu>
Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
        "Re: Incorrect use of "expl" ?" (Apr 13,  5:44pm)
References: <170409114724.ZM29567@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<34487.1492098269@hydra.kiddle.eu>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Incorrect use of "expl" ?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Thanks for digging through all these, Oliver.  One question --

On Apr 13,  5:44pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
}
} diff --git a/Completion/Unix/Command/_stgit b/Completion/Unix/Command/_stgit

Two hunks like this:

} -      _wanted -V "unapplied patches" expl "patch" \
} +      _wanted -V unapplied-patches expl "patch" \

But then:

} @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ else
}        last_word="$words[$CURRENT-1]"
}        refresh_patch_options=( -p --patch )
}        if [[ -n ${refresh_patch_options[(r)$last_word]} ]]; then
} -	_wanted -V "applied patches" expl "patch" \
} +	_wanted -V applied-patch expl "patch" \
}  	  compadd ${${(M)${(f)"$(stg series 2> /dev/null)"}##[+>] *}#[+>] } \
}  		  && ret=0
}        else

Should that be "applied-patches" in the third hunk as well?