From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23149 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2017 21:00:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40988 Received: (qmail 5013 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2017 21:00:47 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua0-f179.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.179):SA:0(0.5/5.0):. Processed in 0.420403 secs); 19 Apr 2017 21:00:47 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject:cc :mime-version; bh=vr7G6JsKq2udolyQT8Qvl2VGMsXXcrmdG3j0GxSjEok=; b=WGqmapd9dbUugaL9F0u/bfGMW3Zcor3c69Xj9dvnYo1Uf/xgCADwsVtK7PT4h9+U7z B8a/amPdniU3kngoVe0wz6hdsE0PAp4R92ZOa0fWRS6PHF20DGywQQamYQXTRPLVWLkN LqitaJJCzm+XzeppKpbJgrqMP0mHkULIIcZnloGd+7upnMFXm0Z3vHygf8s/m3yoJKfd mJkhksVFiu/LLLedZxcvg5x5WRgFYRsVB3+9Tfl6FDhnIWuqLMfdH0JF87rNzy5Xz2Mh tneGKl+jnSlQwpkmKZNBxPUGGsRmmqZ5G16/fwGhLf/hzi1sPNuVx8/z8P9BSG/XyJjb jn4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:cc:mime-version; bh=vr7G6JsKq2udolyQT8Qvl2VGMsXXcrmdG3j0GxSjEok=; b=IYfO6Xb0qi1I8qlEuGKVN7RlR5us5fZtOncxDz5cajV/5o68MXlKZL+0PemTRbT528 y1BqOX93nTHmw52a77eydB5kxIDNJmpxCV0j7n8U3nQhzKAO4UyQd+cSWKRnJhH0SAkZ RgP9WmGWK5KdLkF6n6JsGAPZi+VXH6z/XP9u5BbgTg9a1Q4cWySl3ASKoNAviSI19kZV aHSeusVxNqIZwpAXFU8AoGGZR/iUohRBIo2M8salmx0CCPuFnkeHt2DFx4yVQdIk04Mq YP5RH6uFk5LkRKK3m/6k37X08A4RdXIDhnQTY5fzRt8NLOO3LKrlYrv9C3YF6zchqsMO WR/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6sotf0uLIHzhQC4a996GmGL9mJSRQJWP5mnwRKURiYJuUP0/Cf etG7z8gHsodKqg== X-Received: by 10.176.2.129 with SMTP id 1mr2140861uah.36.1492635644389; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:00:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <170419140119.ZM32084@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:01:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3185849.ijjV0Re2JH@kdudka-nb> Comments: In reply to Kamil Dudka "Re: unbounded recursive call in a shell script crashes zsh" (Apr 18, 3:54pm) References: <2960832.nVDpiBkaWZ@kdudka-nb> <3185849.ijjV0Re2JH@kdudka-nb> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Kamil Dudka Subject: Re: unbounded recursive call in a shell script crashes zsh Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 18, 3:54pm, Kamil Dudka wrote: } } What helped significantly to make the default shell call nesting limit } reachable again was the -fconserve-stack option of GCC. If you're going to change the configure-time options to make the stack compact, you could also/instead change them to reduce the nesting limit. I suppose it depends on whether your primary goal is to make the call depth consistent, or is to avoid the shell crashing.