From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14834 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2017 19:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 41033 Received: (qmail 463 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2017 19:47:11 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua0-f171.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.171):SA:0(-2.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.262978 secs); 29 Apr 2017 19:47:11 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=94eiRVNADPigYKMSmgqMEzBXsLB0A21m0Fb2l8TgiE8=; b=xJyp4ibPeJoWb43zmRLkewv1iSCq1rRqs+P/Tor2J229Qi2IQGTWH+8CFcCFaqwLEv YfZwJAEDIUHgrsDwKego6mDsaGAViE0E7ARvLBeR59f7i0EMpvx0R1mXYSCAHgbdDXt4 4Tt2IHvjl0nGuk6VcwMysX8mjdpkq0ZZ/u8ZVzyuueZUbfqeOKi5TG1tv9QpK3O0sKyf JvgX+2K4cGPt3ojWlVVQusOsY6CsPybKjh9FyeIHvgE0NPLyfeMcvgI2keunZvbY+lHm e/FZfC5kbsNNfYkDDqS9TESLbVD716rsS7HKhF5m3GYPneoKTu4pAY+UHACPn43mfVyF QIXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=94eiRVNADPigYKMSmgqMEzBXsLB0A21m0Fb2l8TgiE8=; b=NY9mXgYR96MEhmczBlAT3k6V32ZC38HYAAsoEcwFzNiSzSmaUIdC6hn2rBRcUSKQkk neithGX0hzB5E76EZh5u01Att/UXV6gkWCyQz3L8urgUSOzPaS0m6TD57LK5O1LSthY4 fwNhTYKtTIPKuOoNg7mOo7x9x8r7+EsSUDHEimr4ITieA63GptdoS4k457v9QZUnwjUt kgd5MzbZAqHawNntWeSk+Q/IkyS68PjjrwJYX16v8MUngfvqlzzXgyoy0USn+YoHnWSp EHCsR+6M1KK/9WPCr2J2HfhiQ+gx9y0zCW7OsEuOrjP4ixW4GlrhbhhFB2qdzOXCwrRN sAbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4x7wP8OAkRDGcQVXOqpx00XgtcqHuTAPVNRz8qO4Nlbrq5N0zd gTDU31l0dSHazMWm X-Received: by 10.176.3.245 with SMTP id 108mr9139704uau.66.1493495221363; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <170429124705.ZM16934@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:47:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170429170700.GA14300@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> Comments: In reply to Daniel Shahaf "Re: [PATCH] Functions/Misc/relative: use -q with cd" (Apr 29, 5:07pm) References: <20170427203537.13535-1-genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de> <20170429170700.GA14300@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Functions/Misc/relative: use -q with cd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 29, 5:07pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote: } } Pre-existing problem: should the function check that cd succeeded? Aside from stderr messing up the display, are there any consequences for the completion result if failure is detected rather than ignored?