From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-41987-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 15752 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2017 19:13:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 41987
Received: (qmail 2293 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Nov 2017 19:13:01 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-pg0-f44.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(74.125.83.44):SA:0(-4.7/5.0):. 
 Processed in 4.481305 secs); 04 Nov 2017 19:13:01 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=Y3xasIjaQOhtdDnHWIBHDLihV4UouI1RUuHG8Yp3H9E=;
        b=iQqkoHKAft7YWo4vKxsG4ZHTFsq0VoGvrn/JlzGnGOPApD6sxyD2b9E7GHMQzFVghJ
         Xfjd/ZCmCPKBJWezsUrxSsa/nfI3R90BABVHDtgafxq9GEu8hBhN66FjWRmd/0YPIfWT
         8X7pZC+oAuyRi4xkkkHnh3nJI26yNqnxqZaasVTq6wfwWv4jIO2LOeXa2NYIs70UyAgD
         gJDKG1E6kMPiiiR+kA/52U3p6DsEFddaJnC61wcgIMYwObBMu8FecbDEKQFTOrnUdWWb
         d4cy6yh45QI4q0GRSghFvSvWQihyzutz3o7geMVQ6Kjke9+5vGq6zeAYGTocX+vGZV8K
         hnTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=Y3xasIjaQOhtdDnHWIBHDLihV4UouI1RUuHG8Yp3H9E=;
        b=T3yAYsQiKIhsfW/4Th4FaO0lDSVmtNeRcbiKggJvEsyjdj7gm/CPmy2ow+vJL+BOtq
         AKbs3+XnqR1vnGty2xhdEbSdF6xObtDR1XFRH9FwQHmqnZYk9nXTzquCO5q4fjvlrWUF
         1dEPx+Hf7ScxJo22XXfBlqA+Ewxz4s5ayjNaSkrOPqjODxPRMTNieWCFch4Njfdg/EcF
         g8erwCGSRk4HF0frO95tOIIxFD8rkwgnCjB+V8BnlNyoLV1f7IVuKKWLDePXy7/05Zm2
         yQwhgqiF0KrolfMn8olpP24xOYDLUcF11sNsVQd7/Gs/QhczjHAwuyek8lEVhVWHfXry
         EhGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUV8BWmvlRtVcfy2mRen7wUvr/oCgmPdzLBj1JKosFmlyRbW9Tu
	ei/h9uTUpdyNbWTqOam/mIKEkEYG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+StOnLoUfsK3nnZoHtDVNGbOJ48knOtFvQ19JUj1z+N7it+4YpIe483F9B+zrFBkWNSg7IO4g==
X-Received: by 10.99.126.84 with SMTP id o20mr10910935pgn.220.1509822774137;
        Sat, 04 Nov 2017 12:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <171104120303.ZM1348@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 12:03:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <etPan.59fdf173.2b80f469.98a8@zdharma.org>
Comments: In reply to Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@zdharma.org>
        "Re: Localize MATCH, MBEGIN, etc. in _zstyle and _globquals" (Nov  4,  5:57pm)
References: <etPan.59f5be1b.1dad7c90.98a8@zdharma.org> 
	<etPan.59f655ed.1f659851.98a8@AirmailxGenerated.am> 
	<etPan.59fb6d5b.6529e0b6.98a8@zdharma.org> 
	<etPan.59fb7aea.497d9379.98a8@AirmailxGenerated.am> 
	<etPan.59fdf173.2b80f469.98a8@zdharma.org>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Localize MATCH, MBEGIN, etc. in _zstyle and _globquals
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Nov 4,  5:57pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
}
} I'm just gonna share something that shows that / substitution could
} allow regex too, in ideal world.

Substitution is *very* tightly connected to the internal glob matcher;
I think it'd be quite a significant refactoring effort to replace that
with calls to the externally-linked regex library -- plus we already
have the PCRE vs. standard regex contortion.  There'd also need to be
different syntax (maybe just another (#) marker would to work) to signal
when you want regex interpretation, etc.