From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27460 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 12:36:01 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 12:36:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 29282 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2003 12:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18955 Received: (qmail 29272 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 12:35:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 12:35:55 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [195.245.230.51] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 12:35:55 -0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: okiddle@yahoo.co.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-33.messagelabs.com!1061469335!144435 X-StarScan-Version: 5.0.7; banners=-,-,- Received: (qmail 21655 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 12:35:44 -0000 Received: from iris.logica.co.uk (158.234.9.163) by server-6.tower-33.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 12:35:44 -0000 Received: from gmcs3.local ([158.234.142.61]) by iris.logica.co.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id h7LCXsHM028269 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:33:54 +0100 Received: from gmcs3.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gmcs3.local (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id h7LCZWR01731 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:35:32 +0200 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk X-VirusChecked: Checked X-StarScan-Version: 5.0.7; banners=.,-,- In-reply-to: <20030820142223.GJ821@localhost.localdomain> From: Oliver Kiddle References: <752.1058355009@csr.com> <5225.1061375744@gmcs3.local> <20030820142223.GJ821@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: du(1) completion and a little $RANDOM problem Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:35:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1729.1061469332@gmcs3.local> Doug Kearns wrote: > Yes, this would be nice and it's on my todo list along with support for > all the 'standard' environment variables, but ... I didn't think we were that lacking in terms of standard environment variables. There's a number that could be handled by _command_names (EDITOR, VISUAL, CC etc) perhaps. All *path, *PATH and LC_* variables are handled by a pattern completion. > > Trouble is that these are just the sort of things that have > > slightly different options on every system you look at. > > exactly ... [sigh] Though it's probably better to write them and hopefully over time they can handle more systems. Oliver