From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-19220-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 16730 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 13:31:58 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 13:31:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 8240 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2003 13:31:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 19220
Received: (qmail 8208 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 13:31:48 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 13:31:48 -0000
X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk)
Received: from [193.109.254.211] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 13:31:48 -0000
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: okiddle@yahoo.co.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-36.messagelabs.com!1067866306!1579517
X-StarScan-Version: 5.1.13; banners=-,-,-
Received: (qmail 25451 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 13:31:46 -0000
Received: from iris.logica.co.uk (158.234.9.163)
  by server-3.tower-36.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 13:31:46 -0000
Received: from gmcs3.local ([158.234.142.61])
	by iris.logica.co.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id hA3DVjAb025327
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:31:45 GMT
Received: from gmcs3.local (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gmcs3.local (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id hA3DZ5o18629
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:35:05 +0100
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-StarScan-Version: 5.0.7; banners=.,-,-
In-reply-to: <9516.1067864688@csr.com> 
From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <9516.1067864688@csr.com>
Subject: Re: $pipestatus broken 
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:35:05 +0100
Message-ID: <18627.1067866505@gmcs3.local>

Peter wrote:

> Is this any good?  I haven't properly tested it since you're more in a
> position to see if it fixes things.

That now works. Thanks

> The widget code wasn't using the save-return-values facilities of
> doshfunc because it wanted the status.  I've made doshfunc pass that
> back separately.

Looking at it, that seems sensible.

Would be good to have these applied to 4.0 too.

Thanks

Oliver