From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16677 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2009 04:06:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27408 Received: (qmail 9930 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2009 04:06:43 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at klanderman.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19199.32335.668135.635157@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:06:39 -0500 From: Greg Klanderman To: Zsh list Subject: two completion files for hg (mercurial)? Reply-To: gak@klanderman.net X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid (i386-redhat-linux) I just noticed that in zsh/Completion/Unix/Command we have both _hg and _mercurial defining completion for 'hg'. Looking at the cvs log for each, it appears _hg is newer, and that _mercurial should have been removed when Peter committed Brendan Cully's new Mercurial completion submitted in workers #27088 earlier this summer. However, there appear to be at least some instances of '2> /dev/null' that are in _mercurial but not in _hg that may be desirable. But I don't actually use hg so please don't take my word for it... Greg