From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA01838 for <mason@primenet.com.au>; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 11:05:38 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA17521; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 21:01:23 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 21:01:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Zefram <A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <19720.199608020100@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"
To: srb@cuci.nl (Stephen R. van den Berg)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 01:59:59 +0100 (BST)
Cc: hzoli@cs.elte.hu, pws@ifh.de, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-Reply-To: <199608011444.QAA30597@hera.cuci.nl> from "Stephen R. van den Berg" at Aug 1, 96 04:44:51 pm
X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk
X-Stardate: [-31]7900.20
X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"aYLJi.0.eH4.TDL0o"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/1884
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

>+	*[zc]sh*) echo "Warning: really perverted make detected"; SHELL="";;

Wouldn't it be better to do the feature tests, ignoring the name in
$SHELL?  Maybe some perverted admin has a copy of sh under the name
zsh.  Or even better, just use /bin/sh, which is Bourne-compatible
everywhere, rather than accepting whatever $SHELL happens to be.

-zefram