From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.mira.net.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA13157 for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>; Wed, 31 May 1995 19:15:49 +1000
Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA16529
  (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>); Wed, 31 May 1995 05:10:39 -0400
Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA19894; Wed, 31 May 1995 05:08:22 -0400
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 18:08:37 +0900
Old-Return-Path: <yamagata>
From: yamagata@axps.kek.jp
Message-Id: <199505310908.SAA02713@axps.kek.jp>
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: is this bug?
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 18:08:37 +0900
Resent-Message-Id: <"6-JW7.0.ms4.583pl"@math>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/56
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

Hello, I'm running zsh-2.6-beta9 on DEC alpha station with OSF/1 V3.0.
I found that ZLE history data may be wrong in case of using '<<'.
Probably this is not only in zsh-2.6-beta9.

here example,

axps:zsh-2.6-beta9$ cat << EOF
> aaa
> bbb
> cc
> EOF (press [enter])
aaa
bbb
cc

( and press ^P, I've got )
axps:zsh-2.6-beta9$ cat << EOF (<--- cursor here)

I've tested some other command instead of cat,
then it looks like that,

some << EOF
....           <--+
....              |
....              | these part will be missed
....              |
EOF            <--+

Is this correct or bug?

Best regard,
yamagata@axps.kek.jp