From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.mira.net.au (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id GAA21847 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 06:46:10 +1000 Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA04750 (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for ); Mon, 25 Sep 1995 16:47:33 -0400 Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA23883; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 16:40:53 -0400 Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 16:43:20 -0400 (EDT) Old-Return-Path: From: Jeff Blank Message-Id: <199509252043.QAA10697@bullwinkle.tc.mtu.edu> Subject: signames.h (Solaris 2.4) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 16:43:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-Id: <"gGGrI1.0.5r5.KFnPm"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/405 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I remember that there's been discussion of signames.h and the SIGCOUNT macro on this list...but not having had any problems, I didn't pay much attention. Now I might be having a problem. =) I'm building 2.6-beta10 on a Solaris 2.4 machine. My SIGCOUNT is 43, and I can't quite remember whether that's the correct value. Could somebody clue me in? Thanks, Jeff -- "Instead of trying to build newer and | Jeff Blank bigger weapons of destruction, we | MTU IT/Telcom should be thinking about getting more | jfblank@mtu.edu use out of the ones we already have." | http://pace1.cts.mtu.edu:8080/~jfblank --Jack Handey