From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from math.gatech.edu (euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7.1) with SMTP id VAA21502 for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 21:18:43 +1100 (EST)
Received: by math.gatech.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA29708; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 04:50:45 -0500
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:50:09 +0100
Message-Id: <199511130950.AA23876@phys.uva.nl>
Old-Return-Path: <bas@phys.uva.nl>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:50:09 +0100
To: buerger@pik-potsdam.de
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-Reply-To: <9511130936.AA14083@buerger.pik-potsdam.de>
Subject: Re: maybe a bug
From: bas@phys.uva.nl (Bas V. de Bakker)
Resent-Message-Id: <"tYhR52.0.6G7.qJnfm"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/601
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

G Buerger <buerger@pik-potsdam.de> writes:

> I am running zsh-2.5.03 on AIX RS6000. Is it a bug that 'ln -sf'
> does not remove existing soft links, unlike the ksh built-in ln?

I do not see how this could be a shell bug.  ln is not a zsh builtin.
Also, I'm not able to reproduce this bug on this RS6000, running AIX
3.2.5.

Bas.