From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from math.gatech.edu (euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7.1) with SMTP id CAA22258 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 02:21:05 +1100 (EST) Received: by math.gatech.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA16521; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 09:49:27 -0500 Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 15:48:23 +0100 Message-Id: <199511271448.AA28782@phys.uva.nl> Old-Return-Path: Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 15:48:23 +0100 To: pws@hydra.ifh.de Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <9511271421.AA18761@hydra.ifh.de> (message from Peter Stephenson on Mon, 27 Nov 1995 15:21:16 +0100) Subject: Re: wraparound broken From: bas@phys.uva.nl (Bas V. de Bakker) Resent-Message-Id: <"lN39Y3.0.324.t_Skm"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/649 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Peter Stephenson writes: > If a zle line continues onto the next screen line, and the last > thing on the previous line is a space, then attempting to cut and > paste the whole thing splits it into two lines. This doesn't happen > if the last character before the wrap is not a space. Sounds like an xterm feature. zsh will just get the return on its input or not. What should it do about it? One could probably imagine some fancy hackery where it tries to figure out whether this happened, but I would classify this as too much code for a not very useful feature. Bas.