From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7.1) with ESMTP id RAA09910 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 17:05:04 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA20571; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:55:48 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:55:48 -0500 (EST) From: Geoff Wing Message-Id: <199601110555.QAA09466@werple.net.au> Subject: Re: Two bugs - zle_refresh To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (zsh-list) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 16:55:47 +1100 (EST) Cc: pws@ifh.de (Peter Stephenson) In-Reply-To: <9601101622.AA24841@sgi.ifh.de> from "Peter Stephenson" at Jan 10, 96 05:22:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"oSams.0.L15.ZPAzm"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/736 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Peter Stephenson wrote: :Yes, my changes seem to have brought this on. I don't feel morally :responsible, however... The problem was that the character for And so you shouldn't. I wrote the am_char code the way it is (partly to make it easier to read and maybe partly to do a quick fix). am_char is really unnecessary, and there's no need for an array. nbuf can and should be accessed directly. :What is confusing me is the condition for using delete-eol or not, :which is in the following chunk of code: I'll look over the conditions tonight and should have a more elegant patch for these problems, including cut-and-paste stuff, either tomorrow or Monday. -- Mason [G.C.W] mason@werple.mira.net.au "Hurt...Agony...Pain...LOVE-IT"