From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA15733 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 1996 09:54:34 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA24650; Sat, 17 Feb 1996 17:36:07 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 17:36:07 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Blank Message-Id: <199602172235.RAA09677@bullwinkle.tc.mtu.edu> Subject: 2.6b13 history question To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 17:35:37 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP3 *ALPHA*] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"TGBvu2.0.416.MXb9n"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/771 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I recently began using zsh 2.6b13 (up from 2.5.03), and I noticed that there are some differences in the way history is handled...for example, ls -l ChangeLog ls -l ChangeLog ls -l ChangeLog ^space ls -l ChangeLog ^no space (etc...) all show up as separate history entries due to varying amounts of space (even with histingoredups set). I even produced the last two with % ls -l Change # supplies the trailing space % !! # omits the trailing space, causing second history entry Do these examples indicate some sort of bug, or is this a new inteded behaviour? Jeff -- "I stayed up all night playing // Jeff Blank *** MTU IT-Telcom poker with Tarot cards. I got a \\ jfblank@mtu.edu full house and four people died." // http://pace1.cts.mtu.edu:8080/~jfblank --Steven Wright