From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA28543 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 19:49:50 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA08457; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 03:30:56 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 03:30:56 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199603180830.DAA08444@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 09:30:02 +0100 From: "Bas V. de Bakker" To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: "Richard J. Coleman"'s message of Fri, 15 Mar 1996 19:12:40 -0500 Subject: Re: ZSH presence on WWW cf. Perl References: <9603152356.AA07279@suomi.cdc.noaa.gov> <199603160012.TAA26873@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> Resent-Message-ID: <"Vz8fw1.0.342._yHJn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/836 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu "Richard J Coleman" writes: > I agree that nroff is terrible. I've been thinking maybe it's time > to scrap man pages altogether. Put all the documentation into a > latex file, and create a nice zsh manual. I like to have documentation on-line as well. But every time I proposed keeping only the texinfo file, there were loud protests from various people. I don't remember exactly why, probably because they had nothing to read info with. Bas.