From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA27291 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 10:30:18 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA01094; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 20:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 20:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199604170018.UAA05723@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.6 3/24/96 To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Yikes! Missing Patches in zsh-2.6-beta14... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:04:07 PDT." <9604162004.AA10925@marathon.cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 20:18:24 -0400 From: "Richard J. Coleman" Resent-Message-ID: <"GSlh63.0.zG.1b3Tn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/934 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > > There are much more patches missing from beta14 from me and from other > > people. About the init_term patch you included from me, I did not put it > > into my release I used your patch doing the same in zle_misc.c in > > putprompt(). I think that's a better placs for that. That was in atricle > > 791. > > Thanks for reminding me... Yes, I realized that there are patches missing. I'm getting back into zsh work after a little rest (which I needed). I decided to go ahead and make a beta14 release anyway, since I told everyone I would. > I actually checked to see if my zle_misc.c patch was included. It was not. > I simply reposted your patch instead -- after all, a working patch is better > than no patch at all... This is where our opinions differ. I will not put a patch in the baseline until I'm sure it is the right way to fix the problem. rc