From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id HAA27423 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 07:13:56 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA19030; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 17:05:34 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 17:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Zoltan Hidvegi Message-Id: <199606202105.XAA19191@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Subject: Re: zsh-2.6-beta21 released To: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov (Mark Borges) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 23:05:31 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: clive@epos.demon.co.uk, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: from Mark Borges at "Jun 20, 96 03:03:13 pm" Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL16 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"Vz9gj3.0.Ff4.UqRon"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1391 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > BTW, with the recent change to the meaning of `<>', shouldn't the > following patch be applied? Or is that change not considered > permanent? It is permanent. I just forgot it. Thanks. Zoltan