From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id GAA03236 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 06:26:57 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA22850; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 16:19:26 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 16:19:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 14:18:30 -0600 Message-Id: <199607172018.OAA13287@suomi.cdc.noaa.gov> From: Mark Borges To: ZSH mailing list CC: Clive Messer Subject: ZSH-3.0 web page prototype Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado X-Attribution: mb Resent-Message-ID: <"jcfeI2.0.va5.DhKxn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1688 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I'm developing a prototype (very much a work in progress) for zsh-3.0 documentation at the URL, http://www.mal.com/zsh3/ In an attempt to keep robots (and only robots) at bay, I've restricted access to this development directory. To gain access, the username is `zsh-workers' and the password is `falstad'. Hmm, I wonder if there are robots that parse mail archives looking for passwords :-). In particular, the zsh.texi (v2.1.1, as distributed with 3.0-pre3) documentation translated to html via texi2html is now in http://www.mal.com/zsh3/Doc/ (there is also a link from the old test URL). I'm toying with the idea of having a frames version available, but it pretty much sucks right now. A crude ugly version of the documentation is in http://www.mal.com/zsh3/Doc/index-frame.shtml. But I'm thinking of a three-frame window, with indices along the top, chapters along the left, and the documentation itself in the main window, something like: -------------------------------------------------------- | | Indices go here | |Chapter |---------------------------------------------| |Names | | |Here | | | | | | | main | | | doc | | | here | | | | | | | |-------------------------------------------------------| Anyway, all comments/suggestions are welcome, but my immediate concern is the documentation and integrating it back into the FAQ (which still refers to the old manual right now). -- -mb-