From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id TAA29808 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 19:29:30 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA29791; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 05:21:29 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 05:21:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Geoff Wing Message-Id: <199607180920.JAA29548@werple.net.au> Subject: Re: ZLE scrolly bugfix To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (zsh-list) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 19:20:16 +1000 (EST) Cc: A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Zefram) In-Reply-To: <15917.199607171856@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> from "Zefram" at Jul 17, 96 07:56:36 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"wgnd_2.0.PH7.O8Wxn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1693 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu :Actaully, knowing how it works, that patch looks trivially simple. Not :much to show for an hour's hacking. Sorry, I didn't patch it properly. Works fine (in my quick check of the previous problem) :I have to say, single-line scrolling at 9600 baud isn't great. But :it's good to have the choice. The 9600 was an arbitrary choice. It should probably be higher: 19200 or 38400. :Anyway, for 3.1 I'd rather like `lazy' scrolling -- only scroll when :the cursor is moved to the top or bottom of the screen. We already :have this for SINGLE_LINE_ZLE, though of course it's much simpler :there. It would mean some fairly radical changes to some of the :refresh code, so it's probably not a good idea right now. The current problem with that sort of thing is the refresh code would need to know that the line hasn't changed radically since the last change, eg. with ^P (up-line-or-history), ^R (history-incremental-search-backward) type commands. With most editors, this is implicit - the file isn't going to change in this way. -- Mason [G.C.W] mason@werple.mira.net.au "Hurt...Agony...Pain...LOVE-IT"