From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA00466 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 00:48:47 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA08637; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 10:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 10:43:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Zoltan Hidvegi Message-Id: <199608011442.QAA27492@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Subject: Re: Announcement draft To: bas@astro.uva.nl (Bas V. de Bakker) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 16:42:30 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: from "Bas V. de Bakker" at "Aug 1, 96 08:36:50 am" Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL16 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"h96Fz1.0.t62.HAC0o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1875 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > Zoltan Hidvegi writes: > > > More than a thousand bugs have been fixed since the release of > > zsh-2.5.0 > > This makes 2.5.0 sound quite unusable, which it wasn't. Are you also Well I tend to think that 2.5.0 is almost unusably buggy. At least as I remember each time I wanted to write a shell script more complicated than average it turned out that I have to figure out how to circumvent the bugs which prevented the script running. Especially in subst.c and params.c there were really ridiculous bugs. Things like if (...) { char *s = zalloc(10); } It lookd as if someone started something and forgot to finish. I started to hack the code exactly because of these bugs. For interactive use 2.5.0 is quite fine but it was a pain to use it with scripts. I thinkg I'll thant `more than a thousand' to `several hundred' but that does not sound much better either. I'm sure that if you read the ChangeLog you'll really find several hundred fixes relative to 2.5.0 and note that not all fixes mentioned there. Zoltan