From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA04141 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 1996 10:43:10 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA12363; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 20:40:18 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 20:40:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Zoltan Hidvegi Message-Id: <199608150039.CAA09497@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Subject: Re: Final 3.0.0 test release To: schaefer@nbn.com Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:39:35 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <960814111125.ZM12797@candle.brasslantern.com> from Bart Schaefer at "Aug 14, 96 11:11:24 am" Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL16 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"0bDIG1.0.613.n7d4o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1980 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > Are you sure you shouldn't wait to do the release until you're back? So > that the archive maintainer isn't absent for the first ten days of new > non-developer users fooling with it? Even if I'm here a new release should not happen within ten days of the first release. We have to wait for the bug reports to accumulate. That ten day is quite good for that. In the last two weeks there were no really serious bugreports from zsh-workers or from anywhere else. I do not think that an other ten day would bring up enough problems to justify this delay. Zoltan