From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA00671 for <mason@primenet.com.au>; Wed, 21 Aug 1996 01:23:21 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA15856; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 11:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 11:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 08:16:48 -0700
Message-Id: <199608201516.IAA02609@zoger.ipost.com>
From: Bob Glickstein <bobg@ipost.com>
To: schaefer@nbn.com
CC: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-reply-to: <960819224346.ZM20595@candle.brasslantern.com>
	(schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com)
Subject: Re: 3.0.0 configure failure (bug in autoconf 2.10?)
Organization: Interpost, Mill Valley, CA
X-Attribution: BG
Reply-to: Bob Glickstein <bobg@ipost.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <"FLJgi.0.gt3.zST6o"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/2037
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

> So just exactly who is wrong here?  autoconf?  gcc 2.7.0?

It could be either.  What causes the autoconf 2.10 version of the
lstat test to fail?  (Find out by looking in config.log after running
configure.)

Of course, gcc 2.7.0 is three versions out of date; the current one is
2.7.2.1.