From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA04209 for <mason@primenet.com.au>; Sun, 25 Aug 1996 06:19:40 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA04594; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 16:11:53 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 16:11:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@cs.elte.hu>
Message-Id: <199608242010.WAA26244@bolyai.cs.elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Speed of zsh line editing
To: schaefer@nbn.com
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 22:10:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-Reply-To: <960823163554.ZM2929@candle.brasslantern.com> from Bart Schaefer at "Aug 23, 96 04:35:54 pm"
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL16 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"qEkh02.0.i71.88s7o"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/2065
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

> I just dropped my linux zsh 3.0.0 binary onto a machine that I access across a
> 28800 PPP link and tried it out.  Tim Luoma is right -- it's significantly
> slower than 2.6-beta15-hzoli14 (which I have on another machine there) and
> ridiculously slow compared to bash on the same machine.
> 
> I'll see if I can generate some typescript output to send to Geoff.

I use a 14400 PPP link from home and I did not notice anything wrong with
zle.  But I do not use right prompts, that may be a difference.

Zoltan