From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA10089 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:31:52 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA01936; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 01:29:55 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 01:29:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 07:29:23 +0200 Message-Id: <199609260529.HAA14617@anna.in-berlin.de> From: Andreas Koenig To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: 8-bit characters in history and completion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-to: andreas.koenig@franz.ww.tu-berlin.de Resent-Message-ID: <"mwe9d3.0.AU.JJXIo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2171 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Some time between 2.6-beta14 and 2.6-beta19 completion changed wrt 8bit characters. First example is with 3.0.1-test. % ls ha/ he/ hi/ ho/ hr/ hu/ hy/ hä/ hö/ hü/ % ls h ha/ he/ hi/ ho/ hr/ hu/ hy/ h\M-d/ h\M-v/ h\M-|/ % /usr/local/bin/zsh-2.6-beta14 % ls h ha/ he/ hi/ ho/ hr/ hu/ hy/ hä/ hö/ hü/ Is this intentional? Can I influence the behaviour? I prefer the beta14 way to display the real 8-bit character (and the spacing looks also better, imho). I discovered that in history something similar happended between beta10 and beta13, although beta10 looks buggy in another way: % echo hü hü % history -1 501 echo h\M-| 502 history -1 % exec /usr/local/bin/zsh-2.6-beta10 % echo hü hü % history -1 501 echo h^ü 502 history -1 Let me know, if you need additional info. Thanks for the zsh! andreas