From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA08720 for <mason@primenet.com.au>; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 21:48:27 +1100 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA19646; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 05:28:44 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 05:28:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:51:20 +0200
From: Jari Kokko <jkokko@tnso09.tele.nokia.fi>
Message-Id: <199611210951.LAA08582@tnso09.tele.nokia.fi>
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: bug or feature in how zsh looks for commands?
Reply-to: jkokko@tnso13.ntc.nokia.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"1Usqu1.0.ro4.Mx2bo"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/2444
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

Is this the desired behaviour?

$ unsetopt autocd
$ mkdir bin/foobar
$ rehash
$ which which
which: shell built-in command
$ echo $ZSH_VERSION
3.0.1
$ which foobar
foobar not found
$ foobar
zsh: permission denied: foobar
$ sh
$ foobar
foobar: cannot execute
$ bash
bash$ foobar
bash: foobar: is a directory

Jari Kokko