From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6453 invoked from network); 30 May 1997 18:03:34 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 May 1997 18:03:34 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA11051; Fri, 30 May 1997 13:55:49 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 13:55:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199705301800.OAA16311@spacely.icd.teradyne.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: unique partial completion In-reply-to: schaefer's message of Fri, 30 May 1997 09:52:27 -0700. <970530095228.ZM4865@candle.brasslantern.com> reply-to: acs@acm.org X-Attribution: Vin Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 14:00:14 -0400 From: Vinnie Shelton Resent-Message-ID: <"LHOlI3.0.ci2.aInZp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3177 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Not to be hysterical, but since I don't have 3.1 installed (to check this out), let me echo what Bart wrote: The beep is necessary; the lack of a space is not a sufficient cue. vin > On May 30, 5:15pm, Zefram wrote: > } Subject: Re: unique partial completion > } > } Anthony Iano-Fletcher wrote: > } > argo% ls mod > } > > } >as it should (there are lots of mod* files) but there are no beeps > } >or completion lists to indicate that this completion is incomplete. > } > } The indication that the completion is incomplete is that a space is > } not inserted. > > Huh? In 3.0.3-test4, it beeps at me. I don't have a 3.1 compiled, but > I can't call this an acceptable alternative; it's just not obvious enough. > Bring back the beep. > > -- > Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises > http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern >