From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6776 invoked from network); 30 May 1997 19:46:33 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 May 1997 19:46:33 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA12914; Fri, 30 May 1997 15:30:42 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 15:30:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Anthony Iano-Fletcher Message-Id: <199705301934.PAA23311@argo.dcrt.nih.gov> Subject: Re: expand-or-complete-prefix To: Zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 15:34:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"0C1LL2.0.j93.XhoZp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3179 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Hi Bart Schaefer > I've never heard of that one ... are you sure "expand-or-complete-prefix" > isn't what you're thinking of? Yes - sorry. What am I doing today? I should never have started 2 different discussions about zsh on the same day! Not only that but I cant provoke the bug any more! It used to rewrite the line with random spaces and no completion. But now I have another different completion peculiarity! So forget I even mentioned this! I'll get some clean source on Monday and recompile from scratch. I'll see if I can pin this down later. There is a difference between using 'expand-or-complete-prefix' and using 'expand-or-complete' with 'setopt completeinword'. In the latter you can get competions for /usr//bin which include all those directories in /usr that have a subdirectory bin. The former would give a competion list of all subdirectories in /usr. Anthony.