From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22147 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1997 12:56:27 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Jun 1997 12:56:26 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA21982; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 08:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 08:36:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Anthony Iano-Fletcher Message-Id: <199706021240.IAA17346@argo.dcrt.nih.gov> Subject: Re: unique partial completion To: Zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 08:40:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <199705310810.EAA09857@hzoli.home> from "Zoltan Hidvegi" at May 31, 97 04:10:03 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"ljIeh2.0.PN5.Kvhap"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3185 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Hi > The defaults have changed in zsh-3.1.1, the LIST_AMBIGUOUS option is on by > default. Several other options are set now by default (see the Dec 27 1997 > entry in the ChangeLog). This should make zsh more user friendly when > invoked without without any startup files. > Just add unset LIST_AMBIGUOUS into your .zshrc. Thanks, that seems to work for me. :-) So far we have had 3 people who believe that the new default behaviour is not entirely obvious. Why was this considered to make zsh more friendly? Why doesnt LIST_AMBIGUOUS show up when I type 'setopt'? Its only when I do 'unsetopt LIST_AMBIGUOUS' does "nolistambiguous" show up. I looked for the Dec 27 1997 entry in the ChangeLog file but I guess I'm behind the times. I did see an entry that says that setopt was changed to show the non-default options. Is there a way of seeing all the options set? > Many people symply do not know about most of the zsh options. Well that true for me.... I didnt spot this one although I did look - honest! Anthony.