From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 15219 invoked from network); 15 Aug 1997 13:34:23 -0000
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Aug 1997 13:34:23 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost)
	by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA03988;
	Fri, 15 Aug 1997 09:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 09:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199708151315.HAA24323@ghidora.uwyo.edu>
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu, harres@ghidora.uwyo.edu
Subject: zgetcwd patch?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:15:01 MDT."
             <199708121615.KAA06836@ghidora.uwyo.edu> 
X-url: http://ghidora.uwyo.edu/~harres
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 07:15:37 -0600
From: "John M. Harres" <harres@ghidora.uwyo.edu>
Resent-Message-ID: <"SPSw_1.0.C-.oQ5zp"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/3442
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

I never heard a response to the patch I sent to compat.c.
Does it appear correct?

I'm also curious under what circumstances these two operations differ (aside
from the obvious chdir side effect):

1. opendir( ".." );

2. chdir( ".." );
	opendir( "." );

Thanks,
John Harres
harres@uwyo.edu