From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 4598 invoked from network); 9 Oct 1997 18:06:29 -0000
Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Oct 1997 18:06:29 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost)
	by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA01742;
	Thu, 9 Oct 1997 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 13:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andrew Main <zefram@tao.co.uk>
Message-Id: <199710091755.SAA27759@taos.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Archiving patches (Was: Current state of 3.1.2)
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:55:04 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <199710091734.NAA02603@luomat.peak.org> from "Timothy J Luoma" at Oct 9, 97 01:34:02 pm
X-Loop: zefram@tao.co.uk
X-Headers: in preparation
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"GgbsA1.0.9R.FfHFq"@math>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/3573
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

Timothy J Luoma wrote:
>However, those who use Novell Groupwise who have decided to change the  
>standard and now use:
>
>PATCH -reply

Ah, so that's what it is.  I've seen this on another mailing list.
But as no one on the zsh lists uses that[1], it's not a problem.

-zefram

[1] And if anyone did start using it, we'd break their knuckles.