From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4690 invoked from network); 9 Oct 1997 18:18:46 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Oct 1997 18:18:46 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA02242; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:06:26 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:06:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199710091807.OAA03482@luomat.peak.org> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) In-Reply-To: <199710091755.SAA27759@taos.demon.co.uk> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.0b6.3) From: Timothy J Luoma Date: Thu, 9 Oct 97 14:06:58 -0400 To: Andrew Main Subject: Re: Archiving patches (Was: Current state of 3.1.2) cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu References: <199710091755.SAA27759@taos.demon.co.uk> Resent-Message-ID: <"JRfu4.0.wY.YqHFq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3574 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Author: Andrew Main Original-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:55:04 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <199710091755.SAA27759@taos.demon.co.uk> > Ah, so that's what it is. I've seen this on another mailing list. > But as no one on the zsh lists uses that[1], it's not a problem. > > -zefram > > [1] And if anyone did start using it, we'd break their knuckles. Someone gave me this on the procmail list: SUBJECT=`formail -zxSubject:` :0 * ^Subject:.*-Reply { SUBJECT=`echo "$SUBJECT" | perl -p -e 's/^((Re:\s*)*)?(.*)/Re: \3/i; s/(\s*-reply)*$//i'` :0fhw |formail -i"Subject: $SUBJECT" } That takes care of it nicely ;-) TjL