From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3182 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1997 14:10:10 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Dec 1997 14:10:10 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA29498; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 08:55:17 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 08:55:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199712161355.IAA29480@math.gatech.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: zsh reference card[s] In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Dec 1997 14:06:45 +0100." <199712161306.OAA23416@hydra.ifh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:55:38 +0000 From: Bruce Stephens Resent-Message-ID: <"IGh8.0.oC7.4Xebq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3654 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu pws@ifh.de said: > What's better, one huge document or two smaller ones? It could be > three with builtins, which would probably be a good idea to include > since there are plenty of commands like read and print where I can > never remember the options. (I don't suppose anyone apart from Sven > and Zefram knows all the options for compctl.) Probably separate ones. What's in the current one is great: they're all things I'm likely to want to look up without necessarily needing the manpage. I did think of compctl, but if I'm doing anything with that, I'm probably going to need the manpage anyway. (Obviously, this will vary from person to person!) Using LaTeX rather than hacked TeX is better as far as I'm concerned. Lots of the GNU documentation is lovely, but I'd like it using postscript fonts (so it will re-scale nicely) which is still non-trivial to do.