From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16553 invoked from network); 7 Jan 1998 10:17:48 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Jan 1998 10:17:48 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA03178; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 05:02:01 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 05:02:01 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Main Message-Id: <199801071003.KAA30271@taos.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Suggestion for completion behavior To: boonstb@cmg.FCNBD.COM (Brian Boonstra) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 10:03:16 +0000 (GMT) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <199801062211.QAA07018@tnd87.cmg.FCNBD.COM> from "Brian Boonstra" at Jan 6, 98 04:11:21 pm X-Loop: zefram@tao.co.uk X-Headers: in preparation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"heqou3.0.bn.PAriq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3670 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Brian Boonstra wrote: > The one thing zsh fails at that my tcsh -fan friends get, >is case-insensitive filename completion. It's especially useful for >those of us with repetitive strain injuries (which make the shift >key harder to use). It seems a waste to try to write a shell >function for something so trivial. Am I missing something, or is >this a possible keen improvement? There's been a patch for it, which will probably be in the next beta. -zefram