From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 24232 invoked from network); 9 Feb 1998 13:17:53 -0000
Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Feb 1998 13:17:53 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost)
	by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA09073;
	Mon, 9 Feb 1998 07:56:12 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 07:56:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <19980209125729.20504@gm-fidev13.uk.jpmorgan.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 12:57:29 +0000
From: Anthony JR Heading <aheading@jpmorgan.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thomas_K=F6hler?= <jean-luc@picard.franken.de>
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu, wez@twinklestar.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Zle bug
References: <199802010316.DAA17515@twinklestar.demon.co.uk> <19980201154148.01576@picard.franken.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e
In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3C19980201154148=2E01576=40picard=2Efranken=2Ede=3E=3B_f?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?rom_Thomas_K=F6hler_on_Sun=2C_Feb_01=2C_1998_at_03=3A41?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3A48PM_+0100?=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by math.gatech.edu id HAA09058
Resent-Message-ID: <"3ugWQ2.0.iD2.ipltq"@math>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/3766
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 03:41:48PM +0100, Thomas Köhler wrote:
> 
> I'd say "no, it's a bug" ;-)
> Looking at the manpages, I found this:
> 
>           up-line-or-search
>           Move  up a line in the buffer, or if already at the
>           top line, search backward in the history for a line
>           beginning with the first word in the buffer.
> 

Wouldn't it be preferable to fix the documentation rather than
the code?  I've also used this feature for as long as I can recall,
and FWIW the new behaviour I also assumed to be a bug.

Long live the status quo!  Down with user-defined widgets!  Affirmative
action for non-word-boundaries!

Seriously, if you have this function bound the cursor keys, this is
a major breakage.

Anthony