From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8176 invoked from network); 20 Feb 1998 18:04:05 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Feb 1998 18:04:05 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA09415; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 12:48:20 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 12:48:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19980220175020.58576@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 17:50:20 +0000 From: Adam Spiers To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: PATCH: expand-or-complete-prefix Reply-To: Adam Spiers References: <199802201400.PAA14113@sgi.ifh.de> <980220091603.ZM3582@candle.brasslantern.com> <980220092622.ZM3649@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84 In-Reply-To: <980220092622.ZM3649@candle.brasslantern.com>; from Bart Schaefer on Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 09:26:22AM -0800 Resent-Message-ID: <"U1Gnr2.0.2J2.Z7Sxq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3773 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu While we're on the subject of patching zle_tricky.c etc., has anyone had a chance to try my dabbrev patch yet? I'm quite keen to get some feedback on it. Should I release it to zsh-users for testing if everyone here is too busy to check it out? -- Adam Spiers, Computing Officer, New College, Oxford University, UK ** cello/modern jazz/juggling/cycling/Perl/Linux/Quake fanatic, M$ hater e-mail: adam.spiers@new.ox.ac.uk WWW: http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~adam/