From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5784 invoked from network); 28 Apr 1998 13:27:45 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Apr 1998 13:27:45 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA17931; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <19980428092152.50355@actor.cs.vt.edu> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:21:52 -0400 From: Andy Wick To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: up-line-or-search still 'fixed'! References: <199802091323.NAA14145@tower.york.ac.uk> <19980428133446.13422@gmp-fores1.uk.jpmorgan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89 In-Reply-To: <19980428133446.13422@gmp-fores1.uk.jpmorgan.com>; from Anthony Heading on Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 01:34:46PM +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <"n-J2O1.0.6O4.jVTHr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3883 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I sent a message a while back that up-line-or-search DOESN'T work AT ALL on many platforms with zsh-3.1.2-zefram4, up-line-or-history DOES work when bound to the arrow keys. Can anyone get up-line-or-search to work with zefram4? Thanks, Andy On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 01:34:46PM +0100, Anthony Heading wrote: > We had the following discussion a couple of months back. Zefram, can you please comment. > > Anthony > > On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 01:23:55PM +0000, Wez Furlong wrote: > > On Feb 9, 12:57pm, Anthony JR Heading wrote: > > > > : On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 03:41:48PM +0100, Thomas Kvhler wrote: > > : > I'd say "no, it's a bug" ;-) > > : > Looking at the manpages, I found this: > > : > > > : > up-line-or-search > > : > Move up a line in the buffer, or if already at the > > : > top line, search backward in the history for a line > > : > beginning with the first word in the buffer. > > : > > : Wouldn't it be preferable to fix the documentation rather than > > : the code? I've also used this feature for as long as I can recall, > > : and FWIW the new behaviour I also assumed to be a bug. > > > > : Seriously, if you have this function bound the cursor keys, this is > > : a major breakage. > > > > After trying to use the other suggestion, I have to agree - can we fix > > the documentation and adjust the code so that the behaviour is the same > > as 3.0.5? I can't see the way to getting the widget to work for this > > function anyway. > > -- > Anthony J.R. Heading J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd, London > Email: heading_anthony@jpmorgan.com Tel: +44 171 325 5962 > -- awick@vt.edu Andy Wick awick@purple.org Virginia Tech