From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: Oh my God! They killed completion! YOU BASTARDS!
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:30:23 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199805070930.LAA28076@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Andrew Main's message of Thu, 7 May 1998 09:58:16 +0100 (BST)
Andrew Main wrote:
>
> pacman@cqc.com wrote:
> >
> > ... [ about LIST_AMBIGUOUS being set by default...]
> >
> ...
>
This one confused me a bit, too, on my first TAB after the change
since I don't use it and missed the corresponding messages...
>
> Possibility for zsh-workers: should `emulate' have the capability to
> emulate earlier zsh versions? So `emulate zsh-2.3' would turn off
> LIST_AMBIGUOUS and so on.
>
Hm. That may result in pretty complicated code sometimes, if this is
not restricted to option settings. (Not that the current code is simple...;-)
> >17:01 6 londo /home/pacman/src %echo $ZSH_ <--\
> >ZSH_NAME ZSH_VERSION |
> > /---------------/
> >My cursor is sitting HERE! --/ WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?
>
> ALWAYS_LAST_PROMPT. One of my favourite features. It means that you
> don't waste screen space with old completion lists -- new lists visibly
> replace the old one -- and the command line doesn't jump around, so
> it's easier to keep your eyes on what you're editing. This has been
> available since 2.5.
>
> >This behavior is wrong. It's SO wrong.. The vastness of your wrongness here
> >astounds me. All the languages in the world do not have enough words to
> >adequately describe the degree of wrongness exhibited by zsh 3.1 completion.
>
> I'm glad to see I'm not the only person that gets this emotional about
> computer programs.
>
> But ALWAYS_LAST_PROMPT is right. It's SO right. So vastly right that
> having to use bash purees my brain when it puts the completion list in
> the wrong place.
>
Interesting... for some of the things I implemented, I always wondered
if people use it or even like it. ALWAYS_LAST_PROMPT was/is one of them.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de
next reply other threads:[~1998-05-07 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-05-07 9:30 Sven Wischnowsky [this message]
1998-05-07 9:59 ` Peter Stephenson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-05-07 5:14 pacman
1998-05-07 8:58 ` Andrew Main
1998-05-07 16:39 ` Bart Schaefer
1998-05-07 16:47 ` Andrew Main
1998-05-17 1:58 ` TGAPE!
1998-05-17 9:19 ` Bart Schaefer
1998-05-18 5:12 ` Zoltan Hidvegi
1998-05-07 18:45 ` pacman
1998-05-08 8:59 ` Andrew Main
1998-05-07 18:08 ` Andrew R. Large
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199805070930.LAA28076@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de \
--to=wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de \
--cc=zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).