From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 22900 invoked from network); 2 Nov 1998 09:24:14 -0000
Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Nov 1998 09:24:14 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost)
	by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA09389;
	Mon, 2 Nov 1998 04:17:12 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 04:17:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199811020915.JAA10078@diamond.tao.co.uk>
Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5 - Small Src/ patches that were overlooked
To: schaefer@brasslantern.com (Bart Schaefer)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 09:15:33 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Zefram" <zefram@tao.co.uk>
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-Reply-To: <981031021323.ZM12234@candle.brasslantern.com> from "Bart Schaefer" at Oct 31, 98 02:13:23 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"lZNWD2.0.eI2.OYNFs"@math>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/4489
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

Bart Schaefer wrote:
>My patch from zsh-workers/4421 for restore_params() segfault.

I want to know more about this before including the patch.  There should
never be a NULL pointer there, so the real bug is in whatever is adding
a NULL to that list.  Can you reproduce the bug?

-zefram