* Bugs in vi-delete and vi-put-*
@ 1998-11-22 2:15 Bart Schaefer
1998-11-22 3:27 ` Phil Pennock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 1998-11-22 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Sorry, no patches this time, just a report.
Starting with:
zagzig[42] bindkey -v
zagzig[43] echo this is a line
cursor after "line", type ESC dd P j. Note that you end up on the line
below the prompt, even though there was no newline in what was deleted.
Now type p. Note that you end up with:
zagzig[43] echo this is a line
echo this is a line
with the cursor between the two lines. So far 3.0.5 and 3.1.5 have the
same bug. Type j j, note feep on second attempt to move down a line.
Now type k dd. In 3.0.5, the blank line is deleted, but in 3.1.5 all you
get is a feep. The only way to get rid of the blank line in 3.1.5 is to
move up to the previous line and type J.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugs in vi-delete and vi-put-*
1998-11-22 2:15 Bugs in vi-delete and vi-put-* Bart Schaefer
@ 1998-11-22 3:27 ` Phil Pennock
1998-11-22 4:04 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Phil Pennock @ 1998-11-22 3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
On Sat, Nov 21, 1998 at 06:15:15PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> cursor after "line", type ESC dd P j. Note that you end up on the line
> below the prompt, even though there was no newline in what was deleted.
> Now type p. Note that you end up with:
This is consistent with vi. dd deletes current line, including newline.
If you type dd on a line /with content/ in a multiline command, that
line is deleted. Your point about a feep on an empty line is noted.
It looks as though you want dd, when there is only one line, to behave
like 0d$ -- special case it?
HTH
--
--> Phil Pennock ; GAT d- s+:+ a22 C++(++++) UL++++/I+++/S+++/H+ P++@ L+++
E-@ W(+) N>++ o !K w--- O>+ M V !PS PE Y+ PGP+ t-- 5++ X+ R !tv b++>+++ DI+ D+
G+ e+ h* r y?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugs in vi-delete and vi-put-*
1998-11-22 3:27 ` Phil Pennock
@ 1998-11-22 4:04 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 1998-11-22 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Phil Pennock, zsh-workers
On Nov 22, 3:27am, Phil Pennock wrote:
} Subject: Re: Bugs in vi-delete and vi-put-*
}
} On Sat, Nov 21, 1998 at 06:15:15PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
} > cursor after "line", type ESC dd P j. Note that you end up on the line
} > below the prompt, even though there was no newline in what was deleted.
}
} This is consistent with vi. dd deletes current line, including newline.
Yes, I know. The problem is not that dd includes the newline, it's that
there's still a phantom newline left behind when the buffer is "empty."
I worded the "even though" clause badly.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-11-22 4:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-11-22 2:15 Bugs in vi-delete and vi-put-* Bart Schaefer
1998-11-22 3:27 ` Phil Pennock
1998-11-22 4:04 ` Bart Schaefer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).