From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24409 invoked from network); 24 Nov 1998 19:14:02 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 Nov 1998 19:14:02 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA15489; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 14:11:23 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 14:11:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19981124191529.05649@athenaeum.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 19:15:29 +0000 From: Phil Pennock To: Zsh Development Workers Subject: FAQ bug Mail-Followup-To: Zsh Development Workers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1 Organisation: Organisation? Here? No, over there ----> X-Disclaimer-1: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly X-Disclaimer-2: attributed otherwise, are mine and mine alone. Such views X-Disclaimer-3: do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation X-Disclaimer-4: or company with which I am or have been affiliated. X-Phase-of-Moon: The Moon is Waxing Crescent (28% of Full) Resent-Message-ID: <"eM2xA3.0.yn3.QJmMs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4685 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu In section 2.3 of the new FAQ, the first example of the zsh function for cd is missing the closing double-quotes: cd() { builtin cd "$@; echo $PWD; } As a thought: Bart pointed out $==* as an alternative to "$@" (one would almost think he wanted to free up the syntax for something else :^) ... perhaps mention of this in the FAQ in section 3.1 would be appropriate, and perhaps mention in the table in 2.3(5), comments section. I think the point was more that $* was not always correct and relying on defaults is a bad idea. Mentioning both together seems to be one of those hints that might make the concept of the expansion flags 'click' in the user's mind. HTH -- --> Phil Pennock ; GAT d- s+:+ a22 C++(++++) UL++++/I+++/S+++/H+ P++@ L+++ E-@ W(+) N>++ o !K w--- O>+ M V !PS PE Y+ PGP+ t-- 5++ X+ R !tv b++>+++ DI+ D+ G+ e+ h* r y?