From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 554 invoked from network); 22 Jan 1999 16:36:44 -0000
Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Jan 1999 16:36:44 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost)
	by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA26063;
	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:30:47 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199901221630.RAA30618@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-reply-to: Phil Pennock's message of Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:18:58 +0000
Subject: Re: experimental new style completion
Resent-Message-ID: <"JLqlz.0.AN6.wVAgs"@math>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/4953
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu


Phil Pennock wrote:

> 
> Typing away merrily, Sven Wischnowsky produced the immortal words:
> [...]
> > +         eval b\=\( \$\{b:/\*\(${(j:|:)fignore}\)\} \)
> [...]
> > +         eval c\=\( \$\{c:/\*\(${(j:|:)fignore}\)\} \)
> 
> One has to wonder about a shell where /that/ is valid input.
> 
> Whilst it's nice and understandable to people who're extensively
> familiar, doesn't anyone else think it's time to sit back and try and
> look at this syntax objectively?
> 
> (At least, almost understandable... oh yeah, understandable)

;-)

Btw, this is the simple solution. I first tried to integrate it into
the globbing itself but failed utterly.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de