From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Message-ID: <19990126180532.C25695@fysh.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:05:32 +0000 From: Phil Pennock To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: completion with redirections Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk References: <9901251401.AA38413@ibmth.df.unipi.it> <990126095647.ZM24170@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.2 In-Reply-To: <990126095647.ZM24170@candle.brasslantern.com>; from "Bart Schaefer" on Tue 26 Jan 1999 (9:56 -0800) Organisation: Organisation? Here? No, over there ----> X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine and mine alone. Such views do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. X-Mailing-List: 5027 Typing away merrily, Bart Schaefer produced the immortal words: > } > There is a problem: this array contains ")" instead of '>', > } > } I can't see how it can possibly be right as it stands, looking at > } what's around it. > > This typo, if that's what it is, has been around for a long time; it' > that way in globals.h in 3.0.5. Where has tokstrings (not) been used > all this time, that no one ever noticed? I tried analysing this sometime in December. I saw what now appears to be a typo, tried to figure it out, and got lost trying to figure out where it was being called from. There's one place which used the array in a specific condition (don't have zsh sources available now, sorry), and I couldn't manage to trigger the condition. 'fgrep' and 'tags' are your friends. ;^) Thinking about this, I should have mentioned it then. Sorry. -- --> Phil Pennock ; GAT d- s+:+ a23 C++(++++) UL++++/I+++/S+++/B++/H+$ P++@$ L+++ E-@ W(+) N>++ o !K w--- O>+ M V !PS PE Y+ PGP+ t-- 5++ X+ R !tv b++>+++ DI+ D+ G+ e+ h* r y?