From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27397 invoked from network); 23 Feb 1999 09:09:09 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 23 Feb 1999 09:09:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 18044 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 1999 09:08:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5480 Received: (qmail 18037 invoked from network); 23 Feb 1999 09:08:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:08:01 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199902230908.KAA23920@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Bart Schaefer's message of Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:28:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Let's finish this new completion stuff Bart Schaefer wrote: > I don't want to get into anything that looks like a multidimensional > array. We already allow multiple subscripst in parameter expansion, not in assignments. > OK would be $matches[prefix(num)] or something ... though in > thinking about it a bit further, I think I prefer requiring the (r) or > (R) flag to activate any such magic, e.g. $matches[(r)prefix(num)]. > The connection to patterns is useful; it's just a special case of a > pattern. Yes, I'd prefer requiring the `(r)', too. (Hm, I already said that, didn't I? I think so...) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de