From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29917 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1999 15:35:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Mar 1999 15:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12363 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 1999 15:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5587 Received: (qmail 12354 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1999 15:34:13 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:33:30 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199903011533.QAA15441@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:12:32 +0100 Subject: Re: pws-10 + completion broken ? Peter Stephenson wrote: > Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > Now the (simplest) completion seems broken. > > > > Have I missed something? > > Nope, that seems to be the way things are. Not an intentional way of > making people try the new completions system, but maybe it'll work :-? (I had the same idea, but didn't dare to say something like that... ;-) Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de