From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16605 invoked from network); 11 Mar 1999 08:25:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Mar 1999 08:25:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 15328 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 1999 08:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5750 Received: (qmail 15321 invoked from network); 11 Mar 1999 08:25:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:25:16 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199903110825.JAA18412@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: Bart Schaefer's message of Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:32:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: compctl -v Bart Schaefer wrote: > The argument for leaving out all default compctls from 3.1.2+, last time I > heard it, is that the above set isn't "good enough" by comparison to the > collection in Misc/compctl-examples to be worth having. I've been saying > for at least a year now that I think that's a silly reason to have zsh > out-of-the-box default to completing nothing but file names, but I guess > I'm beating a dead horse. Ah, having been away at the time, I always wondered... I'm tempted to suggest a simple patch with just an array of strings and making `boot_compctl()' simply call `bin_compctl()', hm. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de